The ways in which politicians have discussed who, what, and where was considered “uncivilized’” across the past two centuries gives an insight into how speakers in a position of authority classified and constructed the world around them, and how those in power in Britain see the country and themselves. This article uses the Hansard Corpus 1803–2003 of speeches in the UK Parliament alongside data from the Historical Thesaurus of English to analyse diachronic variation in usage of words for persons, places and practices considered uncivil. It proposes new methods and offers quantitative data to describe the period’s shift in political attitudes towards not just the so-called “uncivil” but also the country as a whole
This paper explores the language of MPs and Peers, when negotiating their differences in times past....
Negativity towards the institutions of formal politics is currently a concern across much of the dem...
“Colloquialization,” and anti-colloquial effects such as “densification,” have been shown to shape r...
This article engages with current debates about linguistic usage but in a new way. It examines lingu...
In this paper, we explore how sociocultural changes were reflected in the parliamentary record, a ge...
Impolite behaviour is thought to be easier to investigate than polite or politic behaviour in diachr...
Creating, curating and maintaining modern political corpora is becoming an ever more involved task. ...
This paper is a study of the language used to articulate UK foreign policy regarding the unification...
The transcripts of UK parliamentary debates, offered by the Hansard Online collection are a major re...
In this chapter we use new corpus linguistic software tools to investigate the discourse(s) of labou...
For many scholars who are not themselves historians of political thought, the major use of official ...
This article explores the interrelatedness of societal changes and changes in language practices. By...
We conduct an analysis of the link between colloquialisation and democratisation in debates in the B...
This paper explores the language of MPs and Peers, when negotiating their differences in times past....
Negativity towards the institutions of formal politics is currently a concern across much of the dem...
“Colloquialization,” and anti-colloquial effects such as “densification,” have been shown to shape r...
This article engages with current debates about linguistic usage but in a new way. It examines lingu...
In this paper, we explore how sociocultural changes were reflected in the parliamentary record, a ge...
Impolite behaviour is thought to be easier to investigate than polite or politic behaviour in diachr...
Creating, curating and maintaining modern political corpora is becoming an ever more involved task. ...
This paper is a study of the language used to articulate UK foreign policy regarding the unification...
The transcripts of UK parliamentary debates, offered by the Hansard Online collection are a major re...
In this chapter we use new corpus linguistic software tools to investigate the discourse(s) of labou...
For many scholars who are not themselves historians of political thought, the major use of official ...
This article explores the interrelatedness of societal changes and changes in language practices. By...
We conduct an analysis of the link between colloquialisation and democratisation in debates in the B...
This paper explores the language of MPs and Peers, when negotiating their differences in times past....
Negativity towards the institutions of formal politics is currently a concern across much of the dem...
“Colloquialization,” and anti-colloquial effects such as “densification,” have been shown to shape r...